Three New "R's" for Success

This past week I caught a portion of a radio interview with Arthur Alexander, an economist at Georgetown University, who stated that Japan will recover quickly from the recent devastating earthquake and tsunami. The reason, he said, is because Japan has three things that are built into advanced modern economies: Redundancy, Resilience, and Robustness.  As Susan and I rode down the highway, we reflected on how important these three R’s are for success in any organization.

Redundancy

We usually think of a redundancy as something that is superfluous or unnecessary. In fact, the first definition in Dictionary.com supports that concept: “superfluous repetition or overlapping.” Look farther down, however, and see another meaning: “the provision of additional or duplicate systems, equipment, etc., that function in case an operating part or system fails, as in a spacecraft.” Redundancy, in this light, is preparing for an emergency to ensure the seamless continuation of production even if essential parts or players are unexpectedly removed.

Many businesses do themselves a huge disfavor by trying to avoid redundancies in an effort to reduce operating costs and increase profit margins. Whenever a major merger takes place, for example, redundant jobs are eliminated in an effort to streamline personnel costs. In difficult economic times, tenured workers (who, admittedly, usually have higher salaries and benefits) are offered early retirement incentives without taking into consideration the brain trust of experience they represent and without making sure someone else knows everything they knew before they leave. When the only person who knows how to do the job is suddenly unavailable, momentum is lost or production in that area comes to a screeching halt until the person returns or someone new learns to do the job.

Redundancy in your business or organization is not just a matter of having two people who do the same job. It is more a matter of contingency preparation. Redundancy might include such things as mentoring and preparing young leaders for succession. It could also be something as simple as keeping good backups of your essential files and correspondence. Redundancy, as Dr. Alexander pointed out, can be a good thing.

Resilience

Again, Dictionary.com comes to our aid in defining resilience:

“1. the power or ability to return to the original form, position, etc., after being bent, compressed, or stretched; elasticity.

2. ability to recover readily from illness, depression, adversity, or the like; buoyancy.”

The opposite of resilience is resistance or rigidity. When managers take an attitude of “ours is not to reason why, ours is but to do and die,” they usually lead people on  a destructive path of resistance or resignation. (These are two R’s you probably would want to avoid!)

Resilience is the ability to deal with unexpected change and adapt to the new reality.  You build resilience by introducing change in increments and developing an ethos of embracing change for the better. In resilient organizations, frontline workers actually will introduce needed change.

Robustness

Robustness is associated with good health. Dictionary.com, what do you say? “Strong and healthy; hardy; vigorous.”

A robust organization will not suffer from a prolonged depressed morale. Even robust organizations will have setbacks when crises hit. The difference is, a robust organization will have built the resilience needed to recover and bounce back quickly. A sick organization, on the other hand, will have built up more resistance and rigidity that ultimately leads to another “R”: Rigor mortis.

To have a healthy and hardy organization, you need healthy and hardy personnel. Robustness is not only related to physical well-being. It also assumes emotional, spiritual, and psychological health. To be robust, the organization needs to build an ethos of its members caring for each other. That means coworkers looking out for each other. It also means supervisors taking a genuine interest in the welfare of their personnel. People throughout a robust organization will demonstrate their confidence that they are regarded as more than just expendable resources.

Hint to the Leader

Regardless of your position, you can help develop redundancy, resilience and robustness in the people who look to you for leadership. What can you do right now to start building the three R’s into your organization?

Hint to the Follower

The difference between building resistance or resilience starts with a personal decision. Decide right now to be part of the solution and not part of the problem. Look for ways to make things better and find an appropriate way to share your thoughts with others.  

© Copyright Dr. Larry Gay, March 2011

"Lessons on Leadership and Followership"

http://mylead360.blogspot.com/

How do you spell "Success?"

"I want that guy out of here in 60 days!" The angry CEO made it clear he did not like the lower level manager, not necessarily because of poor job performance, he simply did not like the guy.

A major part of the problem, however, was the fact that from the beginning there was no standard of performance or clear expectation of how the manager would do his job. So he had rocked along for several months doing what he thought was a pretty good job. Then, "Wham!" Out of the blue he was blindsided with the fact that he had not been meeting the CE0's expectations and there was no opportunity to rectify the problem.

Sometimes even following a clearly written job description is not enough to guarantee successful job performance. Job descriptions often describe typical tasks that are to be performed while failing to define the most important item of all, which is how will success be defined?

Remember the old antacid commercial: "How do you spell relief?" Smiling men and women declared, "I spell relief R-O-L-A-I-D-S." They knew exactly what to do to get the desired outcome of relief from the pain of heartburn.

So how do you spell SUCCESS? A team can get along fabulously well, with no conflicts, everyone respecting each other and enjoying working together while they are effectively accomplishing absolutely NOTHING for the company. They might rate themselves an A+ team in spite of the fact that they have zero tangible results. They can even come up with a score card rating themselves on their performance while measuring the wrong things.

To head off this train wreck before it leaves the track, be sure the train is on the right track! Make sure you both spell SUCCESS the same way!

Hint to both the Leader and the Follower:
Make sure the job description not only includes tasks to be completed, but also the main objective to be accomplished through this position.

Make sure you both know how you will measure success and agree on how and when success will be evaluated.

Hint to the Leader:
Clarify what steps will be taken if success is not acheived. The first corrrective action should be to help the follower improve performance, increase their effectiveness and contribute more positively to the company's objectives. Don't just fire under-performers without first investing in them to help them become peak-performers.

Hint to the Follower:
Ask how you are doing and if you are making a positive contribution to the company's objectives. If you have not received a performance review in over a year, ask for one. Let your boss know you want honest feedback so you can give the job your best effort. Show that you care for the company and want to help it be successful. To do that, you need to know how to spell SUCCESS.

(c) 2011 Dr. LarryN. Gay http://mylead360.blogspot.com/

     "Lessons on Leadership and Follwership"

Do what is right because it is right

How often do you vote for someone who has a reputation for being corrupt?  We try to elect people who we think will be men and women of integrity. Then we are often disappointed when our elected officials do not behave as we had expected. Politicians have no problem making promises about how they intend to make changes if they are elected to office. In fact, they probably really do believe they will behave differently than their predecessors when they come into office. All too often, however, something happens when they get to Washington, the state capital, or City Hall. They discover that the view from inside the office is not the same as it was from outside and, instead of changing things for the better, they seem to change.

But do they really change, or are they just acting like the person they really are?

The 2010 mid-term elections in the USA saw a large number of turnovers in national, state and local elections. Many of the elected officials promised to clean up, make reforms or otherwise change things for the better. While that all sounds very good, I am waiting to see if a king-sized HOWEVER spoils their good intentions. I know some of them will do good things, but they could do so much more if they would be true to values on which they campaigned.

In the First and Second Books of Kings and the Chronicles of the Kings of Judah and Israel, history records how every few generations a king would come to the throne with very good intentions. He would make decrees and reestablish the order of law according to the principles and promises God had made to his ancestors. In a few cases, it looked as if a man of integrity had come to the throne. Sadly, there would always be a big “HOWEVER” following all the accomplishments of these kings who set out to be faithful and trustworthy leaders.

What happened? Why do people who show such promise fail to follow through to the end? Because they reach the limits of their integrity. That’s when you can see the person’s true character. Even the great king Solomon failed the integrity test. He made some astute political allies by marrying many foreign wives, but did so in direct violation of clear restrictions God had established. Ultimately, he lost the majority of his kingdom for his descendants because of his lack of integrity and failure to be true to the values he originally espoused.  (See 1 Kings 11)

Leaders show their true colors when they come into position and power.  Integrity is not something that can be ordered, regulated, regimented or legislated. It also is not something you can switch on or off. Either you have it, or you don’t. 

Hint to the Leader:

Do what is right because it is right. Stand by your convictions, regardless of the political outcome. Someone is always watching and following your example.

Hint to the Follower:

Don’t fall into the trap of trying to climb the political ladder by compromising your values. Some hills are worth dying on. Some are not. Learn the difference.

© Copyright 2010, Dr. Larry N. Gay http://mylead360.blogspot.com/
“Lessons on Leadership and Followership”

(You can see some of the “Howevers” from the Kings in:
1 Kings 3:2-3; 1 Kings 11:1-6; 1 Kings 22:41-43; 2 Kings 10:28-29; 2 Kings 12:1-3; 2 Kings 14:1-4; 2 Kings 15:1-4; 2 Kings 15:32-35)

Being Precedes Doing

          Recently, I have talked with several people who left their place of work because they were expected to do something that they considered to be unethical or in violation of their values. In one or two cases, the individual felt they were being asked to do something that they knew was illegal. At some point, you have to decide if your core values line up with the values and culture of the organization. You might decide you can live with some minor discrepancies because higher priority values are still being met, but when core values are being violated the time comes when ways must part.

          When my sons were adolescents, whenever they would leave the house to go out with friends I would always say, “Remember who you are and whose you are.” They never asked what I meant by that. They knew that I was trusting them to remember their upbringing and to act according to the values my wife and I had tried to instill in them.

          There was only one caveat to that. I assumed that my values had become their values when, in fact, they were in the process of deciding just what their own values were. So they acted according to their own sense of right and wrong which did not always line up with my sense of right and wrong. Naturally, we had a few clashes when our values were not in alignment with each other’s.

          It would have been easy to say, “My way or the highway.” In fact, I did say a few times, “My roof, my rules,” but I valued the relationship, so we tried to come to terms. Frankly, some of my values needed to be put to the test. And then there were other values—core values—that were non-negotiable. Having teenagers forced me to prioritize some of my values and determine which were negotiable (and to what degree) and which were non-negotiable.

          Our values determine who we are and how we will act. So being really does precede doing. If my values and the values of the organization are in alignment, I should not have much trouble keeping the rules and acting in accordance with the organization’s policies and practices. If, however, the organization allows rules and regulations to be put into place that are not in alignment with its own stated values, then all sorts of problems can result… and will. 

          The official rules and regulations are not the only source of problems. Consider a manager who is allowed (or even encouraged) to continue to practice actions that violate the values and/or rules and regulations that support those values. The people under this manager’s authority and influence will be conflicted with questions:

- Why is this person being allowed to act this way?

- Could it be that the company’s real values are not what they say?

- What should I do about this?

          All too often, individuals and organizations fail to do the most loving thing of all, which is to take corrective action as soon as any behavior is detected which violates any known value. Dissatisfaction will grow until someone finally feels compelled to act—probably by leaving, being encouraged to leave, or flat out being fired. Either way the result will not be uplifting for anyone.

          So how do we turn this around to a positive note?

Hint to the Leader

- Take a hard, critical look at your organization’s core values and compare these to your current policies and regulations. Where do you see misalignment? What can you do to bring these back into alignment?

- What corrective action have you been putting off that should have been taken earlier? What values are being infringed upon by this behavior? What negative consequences are resulting because of your delay to act? What should you do about it? Do you have the will to do it?

Hint to the Follower

           

- Know yourself. Determine your own core values.

- If you are unhappy or dissatisfied with your work, could it possibly be because some personal value is at odds with the policies or practices of your organization? 

- If a manager is demanding something of you that you know to be contrary to the values and culture of the organization, what alternatives to leaving can you see?  With whom should you share your concerns before taking action?

                                                                                                                   

Previous articles on the subject of alignment:

Your Roadmap to More Effective Leadership (Jan 10, 2010);

The Stewardship Factor (May 2, 2010);

Stress and Job Dissatisfaction (April 4, 2010)

Why Vision, Purpose and Values are Still Important

© Copyright 2010, Dr. Larry N. Gay, http://mylead360.blogspot.com/ “Lessons on Leadership and Followership”

Don't Throw Training off the Train

When economic times get tough, one of the first things that goes out the window is the training budget. Such a knee-jerk reaction throws the organization into a downward spiral that is extremely difficult to reverse when the economy supposedly improves. Leaders often make the mistake of throwing training off the train, without realizing how important training really is. Training is not a benefit. It is not a luxury. Training is essential to any organization reaching its stated objectives, goals, mission and vision.  Throwing training off the train is like getting rid of the fuel makes the train run efficiently. 

Think about it. Your organization begins downsizing, laying people off, firing people who are not top performers, or enticing people to take early retirement. Then you put a hiring freeze on to curb personnel costs. The remaining employees are expected to pick up the slack and take on the responsibilities of the people who have left, but they are told there will be no budget for training to help them learn how to do their jobs better or improve productivity. The predicted results of all this?

·         Stress levels go up.

·         Productivity goes down.

·         Layoffs increase. 

·         Morale declines.

·         Some of the best performers start looking for other places of employment causing unwanted attrition.

·         The downward spiral goes on and on…

Looking for a Catchy Slogan? DON’T BOTHER!

As the organization begins to decline, some leaders mistakenly think the answer is in rallying the troops around catchy slogans, like: “Don’t work harder, work smarter.” Or “When the going gets tough, the tough get going.” In response to that, the worker on the frontline is saying, “Yeah, right. The only problem is I now have twice the work with no more pay (or perhaps even a cut in pay) and there are still only so many hours in a day!”  As Deming pointed out in point number 10 of his 14 points, slogans do not address the causes of low quality and low productivity. They don’t motivate us to do better work. In fact, they can actually become the cause of serious relational problems in the workforce. Slogans have their place, but they cannot take the place of training. People need to be given tools that will help them increase productivity, relieve stress, and give them a sense of accomplishment, a feeling that what they are doing really makes a positive difference in the world. Slogans alone can never do that.

A few astute leaders know that training is not a luxury; it is a necessity—especially in difficult economic times. You might not be able to afford the cost of a large conference center with high-priced motivational speakers of great renown who come in to speak to large numbers of employees all gathered together in the same place, but that does not mean you cannot afford to continue to train your people. In this age of technology, it is possible to do more training than ever before at lower costs than ever before.

Webinars

Webinars, for example, allow people to sit in on a training session saving travel costs for the presenters and the participants. You can do a full two-day seminar with scheduled breaks for a minimal cost. Webinars can be presented one-on-one, to small groups or up to hundreds or thousands. And the sessions can be recorded for later viewing by other participants or reviewing.

Skype

Skype is a great way to give or receive coaching one-on-one or in a very small group by conference call.  And it’s free! If the coach is already someone employed by the same company, then you have no extra cost at all.

Tweet to Train

Or what about training on the fly? You can send out snippets of training in small, bite-sized nuggets throughout the day or week via Twitter, Facebook, or old-fashioned email.

Remember the Library

Hey, here’s a novel idea. Remember libraries? They still have books, videos, and a number of resources available for loan. Why not encourage your people to use their public library or libraries at local schools and universities. Some universities and graduate schools will mail books on loan to alumni.

Mentor/Coach

Assigning mentors or coaches can be another great way to carry out training. Assign every new personnel or new member of your organization to someone who will guide them in learning the ropes.

It really does not require you to think that far outside the box to discover ways to increase training at a time when “logic” might indicate cutting the training budget. Don’t throw training off the train. Instead, go against the flow and train more to increase productivity.

Hint to the Leader

·         Be sure someone has the responsibility to coordinate all training, making sure your people are on track to get the right tools to do the right things that will help your organization to reach the right objectives.

·         Think of three ways you can increase training opportunities for your team and others under your leadership.

·         Set some personal goals for self-improvement that will demonstrate a learning attitude to others who will follow.

·         Volunteer to mentor/coach new people joining your organization.

Hint to the Follower

·         Start a discussion group with coworkers to share best practices or ideas for improving productivity.

·         Think of three inexpensive or free training opportunities that you could suggest to your leader.

·         Volunteer to be a mentor/coach.

© Copyright 2010, Dr. Larry N. Gay  http://mylead360.blogspot.com/,   Mylead360@gmail.com 

Lead them Where No Man Has Gone Before

           An effective leader can lead people to go places where even the leader has not been before without coercing, convincing, manipulating, shaming, or in any other way trying to force the people to follow. This is especially important when launching any new project. 

            The story of Joshua leading his people across the Jordan River provides a great example of how to lead people to go where they have never been before. To read the story, click here (Joshua 3).  Before launching any new project, strategy, or idea, leaders need to:

1.      Learn to follow. The most effective leaders are also good followers. Joshua followed those who carried the Ark. He knew that the leader does not have to be in the limelight all the time.

2.      Lead the people to prepare themselves.  Joshua gave clear instructions to the people to prepare themselves for the battle that was about to come; then he followed to the letter the plan he had been given as he led the people to begin the long-awaited conquest of the Promised Land.

3.      Let go of your ego. Joshua did not have to prove himself or defend his actions before the people.

4.      Lead out in faith with confidence. Imagine being the first person to step into the water. Only the leaders’ feet got wet. They stood in the middle of the river as the people crossed over.

Hint to Leaders

            Are you absolutely certain you are leading people in the right direction with the right plan?  Are you courageous enough to lead your followers to commit to such a plan? What do you need to do to demonstrate that your own faith and confidence are well-placed?

Hint to Followers

            Are you prepared and willing to follow? What do you need to do to get ready?

© Dr. Larry Gay, October 2010

http://mylead360.blogpsot.com/

Effective Leaders Are Good Mobilizers

            The most effective leaders are good mobilizers. They know how to recruit the right people to do the right job and then release them to do it. For a great example of a leader who knew how to mobilize people, look at Joshua.  As he was preparing to march on Jericho, Joshua sent two spies who would report directly to him. To read the story, click here. (Joshua 2:1‑24)

An Effective Strategy for Mobilization

1.    Select the right people.

A.   Choose people you know you can trust to do the job.  Not everyone needs to know everyone else's business. Give specific assignments to specific persons for specific tasks.

B.   Choose people who are already committed to the project.

C.   Choose people who clearly understand the task when you give instructions.

2.    Trust them to do their job. 

A.   Although they used some unconventional methods to accomplish their task, they got the job done because they felt empowered by their leader.

B.   They were confident that their leader would back them up when they gave their word.

3.    Clarify the limits of delegated authority. 

Joshua made it clear that the two would to report only to Joshua. They would give their report secretly to the final decision maker.

4.    Value their influence, from three "I's."

A.   Encourage their input.

B.   Receive their information.  

C.   Ask for their insight.

5.    Wait for the right timing.

A.   What a difference a generation can make! (Compare Numbers 13-14):

                                                  i.    Moses had sent out twelve spies who were already leaders among the tribes. They were chosen by the tribes, not by Moses.

                                                ii.    The twelve were sent to explore the land, not to decide if, how, or when to attack. That was a strategic decision that was never intended to be decided democratically or by consensus.

                                               iii.    The ten majority spies were afraid and used their power, position, and influence to turn the people against their leader.

                                               iv.    The people were predisposed to follow a negative leadership.

                                                v.    Only Caleb and Joshua saw that the decision was really the responsibility of a higher authority than their own.

B.   Joshua must have learned from the negative experience of his mentor, Moses. He recognized that this was not a decision to be made by tribal representatives on a consensus basis, so he sent only two chosen and anonymous spies who reported only to him.

Hint to Leaders

            What can you learn from Joshua's example about empowering your followers and mobilizing them to complete the task you have been given?

Hint to Followers

            What can you learn from Joshua's example about effective followership? How can you use your empowerment and influence to help your leader be even more effective?

© Dr. Larry Gay, revised October 2010

http://mylead360.blogspot.com/

Five Principles of Leadership

Several years ago I began to analyze the principles on which I wanted to base my leadership. In my search for a personal definition of leadership, I discovered that spiritual leadership is defined by Jesus in one word—servanthood. (Mt. 18:1-4; 19:30; 20: 8, 16, 20-28; Mk. 9:35.) Jesus’ model of leadership with His disciples demonstrated that the effective spiritual leader is not so much interested in climbing a corporate ladder as in providing himself as the step-support for others to grow in spiritual maturity. Spiritual leadership is helping people to become all that God wants them to be in Him so that He can accomplish all He wants to do through them.

Five guiding principles have influenced my leadership as I have tried to apply that definition. Although none of the five maxims is original, they have become such a part of my leadership philosophy that I can no longer remember some of their original sources.

1.    Being precedes doing.

2.    Ask God to bless you with His plan, rather than asking Him to bless your plan.

3.    Do what is right because it is right.

4.    Keep the Main Thing the Main Thing.

5.    Servanthood is not the way to the top; it is the top.

The effective leaders I have wanted to imitate, the people I would most willingly follow, all seem to share these common principles and characteristics, even if they might not express them in exactly the same way.

It all boils down to having the same attitude that Christ Jesus had. Though he had positional rights in the eternal universal organization, he humbled himself and took a lower position as a servant in obedience to his Father’s plan, so that the ultimate purpose he desired to see fulfilled would be achieved by his followers, even after his death. (Phi. 2:5‑11)  Jesus could do the things he did because he knew Who he was and Whose he was. He always demonstrated his desire to do his Father’s will, and not his own. His actions were not always popular or within the accepted practices and regulations of the authorities, but he acted based on what he knew was right in God’s eyes. He never lost sight of his purpose in coming to earth, to preach the good news of the kingdom. And he showed us the way to the top by such actions as wrapping a towel around his waist, washing his followers’ feet, and submitting to a criminal’s death on the cross.

Good supervision is dependent on good leadership. Applying all the best practices of leadership is no substitute for applying the best practice of servanthood as Jesus demonstrated.

© Larry Gay, September 2005

It Isn't What You Know... (Networking)

Your mother probably told you “It isn’t what you know, but WHO you know that really counts.” You might think that you don’t know the right people to help you accomplish what you want to do, but all of us have networks of family, friends and acquaintances that can help us meet someone who could introduce us to someone else, putting us closer to the right people who can help us.

The importance of networking cannot be overemphasized. In career counseling we often repeat that this really is true. Brian Ray of the Crossroads Career Network affirms:

Most employers first try to recruit people through their personal contacts before they advertise a position or list it on the Internet. Of all the jobs that get filled (85%) are part of this “hidden job market.”[1]

So how do these jobs get filled? Through personal contacts.

Another startling statistic came from a private corporate study that demonstrated that applicants who had been personally referred for a job were 42 times more likely to be selected than those without personal referrals. Let’s say that again. According to this study, your odds of being selected for a job are 42 times greater if you are personally referred.

That’s a 4,200% better chance![2]

Did I mention how important networking is in today’s job market? There are several reasons why this is true, but it all comes down to this: employers prefer not to hire someone who is “unknown.”

Six or Seven Degrees of Separation

Consider the phenomenon known as “Seven Degrees of Separation.” The theory was originated by Stanley Milgram in the 1960s and popularized by a game featuring actor Kevin Bacon in the 1990s. Until recently the concept was considered an urban myth by many, but a study by Microsoft has validated the idea that each of us is no more than seven steps from a direct link to everyone in the world.[3]

Just last week, as we were talking about this in a career transitions workshop, someone mentioned the “Six Degrees of Separation from Kevin Bacon” when another participant commented, “Hey, I know someone who knows someone who actually knows him!”  I suppose that just gave all of us a “Bacon number” of four! Theoretically, I am only four phone calls from a personal conversation with him, so if I did want to meet him, I know exactly who I would call first. (Note to Kevin: don’t sit by the phone waiting for me to call. You are only four degrees from knowing me if you need to talk.)

Another Illustration

The most effective leaders are good networkers and they are not hesitant to work their contacts.

Some Greeks who had come to Jerusalem to attend the Passover paid a visit to Philip, who was from Bethsaida, and said, "Sir, we want to meet Jesus." Philip told Andrew about it, and they went together to ask Jesus. (John 12:20-22)

In case I did not mention it earlier, your mother was right—WHAT you know is not nearly as important as WHO you know. (Thanks, Mom!)

Hints to Leaders and Followers

Start a list now of people who could be good resources to help with future projects or could provide a good recommendation. Maintain good relationships by staying in touch with old friends. Give someone a call this week.

© Dr. Larry N. Gay, September 2010

http://mylead360.blogspot.com/

---

[1] Brian Ray, Maximize Your Career in the New World of Work, Crossroads Career Network, http://www.crossroadscareer.org/.

[2] Ibid.

[3] http://www.redorbit.com/news/technology/1507844/seven_degrees_of_separation/ , Posted on 3 August 2008.

Lead by Example, Not by Exemption

In response to last week’s article, a reader (who wishes to remain anonymous) wrote:

Your observations about self-serving leaders (his words) are appropriate.  Too many leaders…don't take seriously their responsibility to care for the people they are supposed to be leading.

A turning point for me personally was when I was a young military police lieutenant in the Army.  During our training as officers we were told that if we ever had to take out a sniper in a building, we would be the first ones in and our soldiers would come in behind us.  I was shocked.  Number one, because I realized that in combat I probably would not live very long, and number two, because I realized that the Army expected me to value the lives of my people more than I valued my own.  After my initial moment of being somewhat stunned, I internalized the lesson, and I have never forgotten it.  “A leader gets paid to lead.”

Another illustration is that among Army paratroopers, it is a time-honored tradition that the highest ranking officer on the plane is the first one to jump.  

The older I get, the more I appreciate what Jesus did, and the more I appreciate the example that He gave us.  

My friend is right. It is a dangerous thing when any leader begins to think of himself (or herself) as indispensible and exempt from the rules that govern the people he or she leads. The best leaders lead by example, not by exemption. Here is a simple formula for effective leadership from the Apostle Paul: 
 

1. “Do not think of yourself more highly than you ought, but rather think of yourself with sober judgment.”   (Romans 12:3)

2. “Do nothing out of selfish ambition or vain conceit, but in humility consider others better than yourselves.” (Philippians 2:3)

3. “Each of you should look not only to your own interests, but also to the interests of others.” (Philippians 2:4)

In summary, Paul says, the leader should have the same attitude that Jesus showed:

“(He) made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a slave.” (Philippians 2:5-7)

 

Can you imagine how the atmosphere in your workplace might change if you started a new trend by adopting these simple principles? Simple, but very difficult to embrace because our natural tendency is to think of self first and others last (if at all). The most effective leaders demonstrate an attitude of service to others. In response, the people they lead tend to follow with loyalty and dedication to the task.

Hint to the Leader

            What kind of example would people say you are setting for the people you lead? Try to think of one way you could begin to implement leadership by example instead of exemption.

Hint to the Follower

             Remember, your leader has needs too. Look for ways to serve without being asked. Even if your own leader does not set an example of servanthood, you can still exert your influence by being an example to others. Something as simple as giving up your place in line can make a difference.

© Dr. Larry N. Gay, September 2010

http://mylead360.blogspot.com/

React to the Crisis or Respond to the Opportunity

            There is a difference between reacting and responding. We initially react to an emergency or crisis in an automatic self-protection mode. Responding, on the other hand, is intentional and requires thought, preparation and training. 

In an emergency the people closest to the event initially react to the circumstance. For example, when a gunshot is fired unexpectedly close to you, you might immediately be startled and crouch down or let out an exclamation or run in the opposite direction. A friend from the past who had been a prisoner of war and suffered from Post Traumatic Stress Syndrome would do all three in reaction to any sudden loud noise, even years after he was released. He would yell out “Hit it!” and jump to the ground or under a table faster than you could turn to see where the voice came from. That reaction was automatic in his case. Some would call that a conditioned response, but it was in fact an involuntary reaction.  

            My wife’s first reaction to seeing a spider is to run and call out, “Larry, come quick!”  That is also an automatic reaction. I suspect she does that even if I am not in the house at the time.  

            When we call 911 for help in an emergency, the first people to arrive on the scene to provide help are called “first responders,” not first reactors. The first reactors were already present and are probably victims of the emergency. Even if they were only witnesses to the event, they are likely to have been traumatized by what they saw or heard. Calling 911 was the first planned response, although even that might often be an emotional reaction. I don’t know what to do, so I panic and call 911. A lot of calls to 911, like a lot of visits to the emergency room at the hospital, really do not require emergency medical personnel.  Many calls for emergency help could be handled by people already on the scene if they were prepared to respond and not just react. First Aid and CPR training are designed to help people take control of the situation and respond in spite of their natural tendency to react by getting out of harm’s way or running from responsibility.

Respond Responsibly

To respond is to act responsibly. In fact, the words respond and responsible have the same Latin root word. My first reaction to a crisis will probably not be the best response. Reactions tend to be emotional while responses are more controlled.

React	vs	Respond
–      Emotional –      Spontaneous –      Unplanned –      Unprepared –      Uncontrolled (at least initially) –      Allows the other actor to be in control –      Victim		–      A choice –      Measured –      Planned –      Prepared –      Controlled –      Takes control and responsibility for own actions

Where do YOU Draw the Bottom Line?

            In the current economic downturn, most businesses have reacted to the crisis by drawing the bottom line too soon. Their reaction to the crisis has been to downsize and reduce costs by eliminating numbers of employees in an attempt to make their balance sheets look more positive for stockholders. With a good “bottom line” the corporate executive can look good and perhaps even be rewarded with a bonus from the savings.  

            An alternative would be to count the human cost in the bottom line and consider the stewardship responsibility these businesses have for their employees and to the community they should be serving.  As stewards of these resources, businesses should be looking for ways to not only keep the employees they have, but even how to add more jobs. What if the executives in an organization decided to forgo any bonuses and all the employees agreed to take a 10 percent cut in pay so no one would lose their job? What if, the executives looked at their own salaries and determined to downsize their own lifestyles to make resources available to add more employees and thereby increase the productivity of the business?   

            That sounds unrealistic, doesn’t it? Even so, as a leader you have been given a stewardship responsibility for the people you lead. Your personnel are not an expendable resource.  When your employees see that you actually care about them as people, that you are looking at the new opportunities to respond and not just react to the circumstances and that you are trying to work with them to find appropriate responses, what do you think their response will be?

Hints for Leaders:

A crisis can become a new opportunity if leaders take time to respond responsibly. What opportunity is this unexpected situation presenting? How should you respond? How can you lead your people to seize the moment, take responsibility and act as responders and not just reactors? Be careful not to spend so much time, energy and resources preparing for future scenarios that you miss the opportunity to adjust to unforeseen circumstances.

Hint for Followers:

How have you reacted to the most recent crises in your environment? How could you respond differently from your initial reaction?  What opportunities might be presenting themselves for change, growth or improvement? What responsibility do you have as a result of this opportunity? 

© Dr. Larry N. Gay, August 2010

http://mylead360.blogspot.com/  

P.S.
Consider the stories of Sarah (Genesis 18:1-15) and Mary (Luke 1:26-38). Both received astonishing news by a messenger from God. Both would give birth to a son. Both reacted initially with incredulity because this would be beyond the normal realm of logic—Sarah, because she was too old and beyond normal child-bearing years; and Mary, because she was unwed and had never had sexual relations with a man.  The comparison ends there, however. Sarah continued in her reactionary attitude with an emotional (perhaps even sarcastic) laugh expressing her doubt. Mary had a different response. "I am the Lord's servant," Mary answered. "May it be to me as you have said." (Luke 1:38) 

WOW! What different responses!

The Cost of Empowerment

     I had never thought of empowerment as something I could choose to experience. Until I read the following paragraphs from Daryl R. Conner, I thought empowerment was something that only leaders could give to followers. Conner, however, challenges us to think of empowerment as a two-way transaction wherein the follower must also make an investment before true empowerment takes effect. As you will see below, there is a price to be paid for receiving empowerment.
[LNG]

EMPOWERMENT


Exceprt from:  Daryl R. Conner, Managing at the Speed of Change: How Resilient Managers Succeed and Prosper Where Others Fail. New York: Villard Books, 1993, (194-7).


     "Empowered employees are those who provide true value to the organization, influencing the outcome of management's decisions and actions. The antithesis of empowerment is victimization. Victims believe they are faced with a negative situation offering no alternatives. In actuality, most victims face alternatives they refuse to act on because they view them as too expensive.

      "Victims resent feeling as if they are being used and tend to feel depleted by change. Therefore, they demonstrate little interest in contributing beyond what is necessary to protect their employment during unsettled times. Subsequently, the organization profits little, if any, from its investment in such people. For foxholes to form, employees must overcome their fear of victimization and engage management in an empowered fashion as key contributors to a team effort. The basis for this approach is not blind faith, but the knowledge that they hold management's bullets, which provides a healthy balance of power in the relationship.

Empowerment Should Not be Confused with Delegation, Courage, or Autonomy

Empowerment Is Different from Delegation

     "Many organizations mistakenly refer to "empowering" the work force when they encourage people to make their own decisions about some aspect of their job. When someone has been assigned the right to make his or her own decisions, it is more appropriate to call this delegation. The term empowerment should be reserved for those situations where employees are not granted permission to take action on their own, but instead are asked to provide input to management as decisions are being made. You are empowered when you are valuable enough to others to influence their decisions--not when you are allowed to make your own.

      "Even if your suggestion is not implemented, you are empowered if your ideas are genuinely considered before the final decision is made. Empowered peoplef do not always get what they want, but their input is always considered important and it carries weight with those making decisions.

Empowerment Is Not the Same as Courage

     "It is possible to act on one's convictions, but not be really influential with others. The act of offering someone your ideas or thoughts does not constitute empowerment unless you are considered valuable by that person. Therefore, empowerment represents both a person's willingness to provide input to decision makers and an environment where that input is valued.

      "When someone chooses to express his or her opinion despite the fact that the decision makers do not seek nor value such input, the act is referred to as courageous, not empowered. The students at Tiananmen Square were courageous, but they lacked the value to be influential with their governmental leaders. Therefore, they were not empowered.

Empowerment Is Not Synonymous with Autonomy

      "It is possible to be independent yet still be incapable of generating a desired result. To be empowered is to believe that you can significantly influence your own destiny. Empowered people do not think they control all the elements of their lives, but they do believe that, most of the time, they are responsible for a great deal of what happens to them.

     "In this context, responsibility implies neither blame nor acclaim, but rather the belief that most of the circumstances in which we find ourselves are the result of how we have defined the situations we face, the decisions we make, and the price we are willing to pay for what we want. So, the hallmarks of an empowered person are the creativity to frame the situation so success is possible, the capacity to face and make tough decisions. and the motivation to pay the price of success.

     "An empowered person has the creativity to define a situation in such a way that the likelihood of success improves. There are three different ways to define and approach situations.

     "1. Opportunities: Opportunities are potential benefits that require appropriate action to fully realize; opportunities can be exploited.

     "2. Problems: Problems have solutions. They may be elusive. but they can be prevented or resolved if you pay the price.

     "3. Dilemmas: Dilemmas have no solution. They are an inherent part of the situation at hand and, therefore, they must be accepted as inevitable. Sibling rivalry among young children is not a problem to be solved, but a dilemma to be managed.

     "Empowered people do not try to fix unresolvable problems: they learn instead how to live with the dilemma, or they shift from viewing a situation only as a problem to seeing the opportunities they might exploit. People spend their careers in one of two ways: (1) as victims of missed opportunities, unsolved problems, and unaccepted dilemmas, or (2) as architectural managers affecting these situations through their own creative actions.

     "The capacity to face and make tough decisions is the second essential component of empowerment. Either consciously or unconsciously, people are constantly making decisions that help determine the situations in which they later find themselves. For example, being unhappy in a marriage is, in part, the result of a prior decision regarding who to marry. Being successful in one's job is partially the result of a previous career decision. Since all decisions are made with insufficient data, once decisions are made, they can be sustained, modified, or reversed based on new information that is obtained over time. Sometimes, living an empowered life requires making tough decisions. The responsibility for what happens, or continues to happen, lies primarily with you.

     "The motivation to pay the price for success is a third key aspect of empowerment. Empowered people approach life as if it were an expensive pastime. They believe that people either pay dearly for getting what they want, or they pay dearly for not doing so. Since both invoices are expensive, they choose the one that represents the least cost for the most gain. They always know, however, that a price will be paid. How much is paid and what is received for that payment are the only options.

     "Although the organization must provide the appropriate environment, it also includes a self-concept earned through creative reframing, tough decisions, and expensive payments. This aspect of empowerment is not something that the organization grants employees and managers or transfers through training. Work environments can be established that attract empowered people And empowerment can be fostered, but it is not a quality that can be given to people simply because the organization has decided that it would be a good idea."

----------------- 

So, according to Conner, I must choose to be empowered.

Hint to the Leader

     What kind of environment are you creating for the people you lead? How can you let them know that you value their input and that you do not merely tolerate them expressing their views?

Hint to the Follower

     Have you been acting like a victim, or like an empowered manager? What price will be required of you to feel empowered? Are you willing to pay the price?

© Dr. Larry Gay, July 11, 2010 http://mylead360.blogspot.com/  "Lessons on Leadership and Followership"